Celeron G3920
Ryzen 9 5900X
Celeron G3920 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G3920 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G3920 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G3920
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $509 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 105W, a 54W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 510, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (948 vs 11,888).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 59.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($40 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +402.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 20.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌1272.5% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
- ❌105.9% higher power demand at 105W vs 51W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Celeron G3920?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G3920 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron G3920
The Celeron G3920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,358 points. Launch price was $52.
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Celeron G3920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3920 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 49.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Celeron G3920 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3920 scores 2,358 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 177.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 699 vs 2,174, a 102.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 948 vs 11,888 (170.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G3920 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 12 / 24+500% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz+66% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 64 MB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 2,358 | 38,955+1552% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 699 | 2,174+211% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 948 | 11,888+1154% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G3920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3920 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3920) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Celeron G3920) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-3200+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3920) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Celeron G3920 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3920 targets Budget, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron G3920 rivals Pentium G4400; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 510 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G3920 was priced at $40, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($40 vs $549), Celeron G3920 was $509 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3920 delivers 59.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 18.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G3920 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-93% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.0 | 71.0+20% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G3920 and Ryzen 9 5900X
