Celeron G4920 vs Phenom II X4 B97

Celeron G4920 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G4920

2 / 2

2,555

+0.6%

2,540

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G4920 vs Phenom II X4 B97 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G4920 vs Phenom II X4 B97: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G4920

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $48 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 93.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 25.4 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Phenom II X4 B97

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G4920 across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,540 vs 2,555).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.4 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4920 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4920 better than Phenom II X4 B97?

Yes. Celeron G4920 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G4920 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G4920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4920 is the better buy right now. Celeron G4920 comes in $48 cheaper on MSRP at $52 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 93.4% better value on MSRP (49.1 vs 25.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4920 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G4920 vs Phenom II X4 B97 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G4920

The Celeron G4920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,555 points. Launch price was $52.

Phenom II X4 B97

The Phenom II X4 B97 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,540 points. Launch price was $100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G4920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 B97 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 B97 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Celeron G4920 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X4 B97 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron G4920 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X4 B97 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4920 scores 2,555 against the Phenom II X4 B97's 2,540 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G4920. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Phenom II X4 B97
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,555	2,540
Geekbench 6 Single	672	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,229	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4920 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 B97 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Phenom II X4 B97
Socket	LGA1151	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G4920) / not specified (Phenom II X4 B97). The Celeron G4920 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Phenom II X4 B97 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4920 rivals Pentium G5420.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Phenom II X4 B97
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G4920 was priced at $52, while the Phenom II X4 B97 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($52 vs $100), Celeron G4920 was $48 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4920 delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 25.4 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 B97 — making the Celeron G4920 the 63.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G4920	Phenom II X4 B97
MSRP	$52-48%	$100
Performance per Dollar	49.1+93%	25.4
Release Date	2018	2010

Search Celeron G4920 on Amazon

Search Phenom II X4 B97 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.