
Celeron G5900

Core i5-13400F
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G5900
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $146 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,600 vs 11,408).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400F
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +250.7% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 138.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 53.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌292% HIGHER MSRP$196 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron G5900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5900
The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 30% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 161.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 2,407, a 95.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,600 vs 11,408 (150.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 10 / 16+400% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+36% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+900% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 2,682 | 25,029+833% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850 | 2,407+183% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,600 | 11,408+613% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5900) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5900) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron G5900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G5900 was priced at $50, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($50 vs $196), Celeron G5900 was $146 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5900 delivers 53.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 81.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G5900 | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-74% | $196 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.6 | 127.7+138% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














