Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Celeron G5900

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5900

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $146 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,600 vs 11,408).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.6 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +250.7% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
  • Delivers 138.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 53.6 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 292% HIGHER MSRP
    $196 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron G5900?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 250.7% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data, 613% better Geekbench multi-core, 833.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 250.7% more average FPS across 38 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 613% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 292.0% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 250.7% average FPS lead across 38 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 138.1% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 53.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Celeron G5900 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 900% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G5900 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G5900

The Celeron G5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,682 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Celeron G5900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Celeron G5900 versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 30% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G5900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5900 scores 2,682 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 161.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 2,407, a 95.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,600 vs 11,408 (150.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5900 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCeleron G5900Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
4.6 GHz+35%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+36%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+900%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+20380%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
2,682
25,029+833%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
850
2,407+183%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,600
11,408+613%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5900 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5900) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5900) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

FeatureCeleron G5900Core i5-13400F
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
192 GB+50%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5900) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron G5900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5900 targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G5900 rivals Pentium Gold G6400; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCeleron G5900Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5900 was priced at $50, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($50 vs $196), Celeron G5900 was $146 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5900 delivers 53.6 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 81.7% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G5900Core i5-13400F
MSRP
$50-74%
$196
Performance per Dollar
53.6
127.7+138%
Release Date
2020
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.