Celeron G5920
VS
A8-6500

Celeron G5920 vs A8-6500

Intel

Celeron G5920

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2020
VS
AMD

A8-6500

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G5920

#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
104%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
34%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
104%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
103%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
103%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
32%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
103%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
103%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
103%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
102%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
30%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
102%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
28%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
102%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
102%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
101%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
26%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
101%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
23%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
100%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
100%
#302
Core i7-6900K
MSRP: $1089|Avg: $1089
21%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
100%
#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
99%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
21%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
16%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
99%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
99%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
98%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
97%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-6500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7199%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6802%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4939%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1488%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1179%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1031%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
591%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
583%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
531%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
531%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
525%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
511%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
503%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
501%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
497%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
100%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
99%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
99%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
99%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
96%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
96%
#474
A8-6500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
100%
#480
Athlon X4 860K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
99%
#483
Core i7-8700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $110
97%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G5920 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G5920A8-6500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8-6500 (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G5920A8-6500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G5920 and A8-6500

Intel

Celeron G5920

The Celeron G5920 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,577 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A8-6500

The A8-6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,598 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Celeron G5920 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-6500 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Celeron G5920 versus 4.1 GHz on the A8-6500 — a 15.8% clock advantage for the A8-6500 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron G5920 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the A8-6500 uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G5920 scores 2,577 against the A8-6500's 2,598 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-6500. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G5920 vs 0 kB on the A8-6500.

FeatureCeleron G5920A8-6500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz+17%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
2,577
2,598
Geekbench 6 Single
756
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,248
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5920 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-6500 uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5920 versus 1866 on the A8-6500 — the A8-6500 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5920 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5920) and FM2 (A8-6500).

FeatureCeleron G5920A8-6500
Socket
LGA1200
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
1866+46550%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+209715100%
64
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5920) vs true (A8-6500). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5920) and Radeon HD 8570D (A8-6500) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5920 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5920 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; A8-6500 rivals Core i3-4130.

FeatureCeleron G5920A8-6500
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Radeon HD 8570D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Budget