Celeron G6900E vs Ryzen 5 3600

CPU

GPU

Celeron G6900E

2 Cores2 Thrd46 WWMax: 3 GHz2022

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G6900E vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G6900E

2 / 2

4,272

0.0%

17,685

+314.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900E vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900E vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900E

2022

Why buy it

✅+38.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $146 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 46W instead of 65W, a 19W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 80.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +152.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Delivers 10.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 80.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G6900E.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 2,631).
❌
275.5% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$53 MSRP
❌41.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 46W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Celeron G6900E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 3600 is ahead with a 152.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900E pulls ahead with 38.6% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen 5 3600 also has the bigger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900E is the stronger fit. You are getting 38.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in 275.5% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $53 MSRP, and it still gives you a 152.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron G6900E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 38.6% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 10.3% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 80.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Celeron G6900E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900E vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900E

The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900E uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900E scores 4,272 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 122.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,563 vs 1,295, a 18.8% lead for the Celeron G6900E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,631 vs 1,898 (32.4% advantage for the Celeron G6900E). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.2 GHz+40%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+700%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-30%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	4,272	17,685+314%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	1,563+21%	1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,631+39%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900E versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Celeron G6900E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900E) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900E) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G6900E) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Celeron G6900E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	Yes
Target Use	Budget	Gaming/Budget Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900E was priced at $53, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($53 vs $199), Celeron G6900E was $146 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900E delivers 80.6 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 9.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900E	Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP	$53-73%	$199
Performance per Dollar	80.6	88.9+10%
Release Date	2022	2019

Search Celeron G6900E on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.