Celeron M 723 vs Pentium E6500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 723 vs Pentium E6500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 723 vs Pentium E6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).

Pentium E6500

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $77 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 90.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,180).
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 723 better than Pentium E6500?

Yes. Celeron M 723 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron M 723 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.7% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 723 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 723 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron M 723 comes in 91.7% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E6500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 90.9% better value on paper (14.0 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium E6500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 723 vs Pentium E6500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E6500

The Pentium E6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 723 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium E6500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium E6500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 versus 0.93 GHz on the Pentium E6500 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Celeron M 723. The Celeron M 723 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium E6500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the Pentium E6500's 1,175 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 723.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Pentium E6500
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz+29%	0.93 GHz
Base Clock	—	2.93 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,180	1,175
Geekbench 6 Single	100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium E6500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Pentium E6500
Socket	BGA956	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Celeron M 723) / not specified (Pentium E6500). Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Pentium E6500
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	None	—
Target Use	Legacy Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M 723 was priced at $161, while the Pentium E6500 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($161 vs $84), Pentium E6500 was $77 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 723 delivers 7.3 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Pentium E6500 — making the Pentium E6500 the 62.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Pentium E6500
MSRP	$161	$84-48%
Performance per Dollar	7.3	14.0+92%
Release Date	2008	2009

Search Celeron M 723 on Amazon

Search Pentium E6500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.