Celeron SU2300 vs Celeron 807

Celeron SU2300

10 WW2009

Celeron 807

1 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron SU2300

545

+1.9%

535

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron SU2300 is positioned at rank 1223 and the Celeron 807 is on rank 1141, so the Celeron 807 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron SU2300

#1211

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7209%

#1212

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7103%

#1213

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

6521%

#1214

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

6491%

#1215

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6432%

#1217

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6211%

#1218

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

5956%

#1219

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

5946%

#1220

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

5786%

#1223

Celeron SU2300

MSRP: $134|Avg: $134

100%

#1224

Core i5-560UM

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

100%

#1225

Core i7-660UM

MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A

99%

#1226

C-30

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

99%

#1228

Core i7-620UM

MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A

96%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

93%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

82%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

69%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

58%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

53%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

51%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807

#1129

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3840%

#1130

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3784%

#1131

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3474%

#1132

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3458%

#1133

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3426%

#1135

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3309%

#1136

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3173%

#1137

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3168%

#1138

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3082%

#1141

Celeron 807

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

100%

#1142

Pentium B950

MSRP: $134|Avg: $35

100%

#1143

Celeron 220

MSRP: $42|Avg: $42

100%

#1144

Pentium B960

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

99%

#1146

Pentium 957

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

99%

#1147

Core 2 Duo SL9400

MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A

99%

#1149

Pentium N3540

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

98%

#1150

Core i7-3555LE

MSRP: $300|Avg: $280

98%

#1151

Core i3-2377M

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

97%

#1152

Core 2 Duo E8435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $74

96%

#1153

Celeron M 723

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

96%

#1154

Core i7-3517UE

MSRP: $330|Avg: $35

95%

#1155

Core M-5Y51

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

95%

#1156

Pentium N3530

MSRP: $161|Avg: $20

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 807 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron SU2300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.9% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Celeron SU2300	Celeron 807
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($134)	✅ More affordable ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron 807 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 93% cheaper ($10 vs $134) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Celeron SU2300	Celeron 807
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+1215%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($134)	✅ More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron SU2300 Benchmark Check

Celeron 807 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron SU2300 and Celeron 807

Celeron SU2300

The Celeron SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 807

The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 807 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron SU2300 scores 545 against the Celeron 807's 535 — a 1.9% lead for the Celeron SU2300. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron SU2300 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Celeron 807
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 2
Boost Clock	—	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	1.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	—	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	545+2%	535

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 807 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Celeron 807
Socket	BGA956	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	16 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron SU2300) / VT-x (Celeron 807). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 807 targets Mobile.

Feature	Celeron SU2300	Celeron 807
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron SU2300 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Celeron 807 debuted at $70. At current prices ($134 vs $10), the Celeron 807 is $124 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron SU2300 delivers 4.1 pts/$ vs 53.5 pts/$ for the Celeron 807 — making the Celeron 807 the 171.7% better value option.