
CMP 30HX

GeForce GTX 1650
CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 7,869).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌436.2% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+60.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 762.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 30HX scores 4,892 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 60.9%. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 7,869+61% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+57% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+68% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+7% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+57% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+59% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The CMP 30HX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the CMP 30HX and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 4th gen.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 75W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 104.9+168% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 30HX came in at $799, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 81.4% cheaper ($650 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 765.6% better value. The newer card here is CMP 30HX (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $149-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 52.8+766% |
| Codename | TU116 | TU117 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #447 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














