CMP 30HX
GeForce RTX 4070
CMP 30HX vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
CMP 30HX vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
CMP 30HX vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,892 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+450.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 634% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
- ❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
CMP 30HX vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 30HX scores 4,892 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 450.3%. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892 | 26,919+450% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 5888+318% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+480% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2475 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 184+109% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 5.8 MB+314% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The CMP 30HX does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The CMP 30HX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the CMP 30HX and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 36 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: No vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | No | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 46.2% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-38% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1 | 134.6+244% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the CMP 30HX came in at $799, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 25% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 636.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $599-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 44.9+636% |
| Codename | TU116 | AD104 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #447 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on CMP 30HX and GeForce RTX 4070
