CMP 30HX vs Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

CMP 30HX

2021Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

2012Boost: 1250 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

CMP 30HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
  • Measures 229mm instead of 278mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 186.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $799 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 17.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $520 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 178.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.1 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
  • 21.4% longer card at 278mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is CMP 30HX better than Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280?
Yes. CMP 30HX is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 4,892 vs 4,765 in G3D Mark. On top of that, CMP 30HX is a 2021 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is a 2012 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
CMP 30HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2012, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
CMP 30HX is the smarter buy by a wide margin. CMP 30HX is about 186.4% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $279 MSRP, and you are getting 2.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is 2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM, 4,765 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
1080p
low124 FPS78 FPS
medium110 FPS64 FPS
high93 FPS51 FPS
ultra70 FPS33 FPS
1440p
low109 FPS66 FPS
medium92 FPS55 FPS
high77 FPS38 FPS
ultra57 FPS25 FPS
4K
low49 FPS24 FPS
medium46 FPS23 FPS
high33 FPS15 FPS
ultra29 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
1080p
low204 FPS131 FPS
medium172 FPS101 FPS
high141 FPS80 FPS
ultra102 FPS54 FPS
1440p
low132 FPS73 FPS
medium104 FPS53 FPS
high85 FPS40 FPS
ultra63 FPS29 FPS
4K
low61 FPS28 FPS
medium49 FPS20 FPS
high46 FPS16 FPS
ultra38 FPS12 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
1080p
low220 FPS214 FPS
medium176 FPS172 FPS
high147 FPS143 FPS
ultra110 FPS107 FPS
1440p
low165 FPS161 FPS
medium132 FPS129 FPS
high110 FPS107 FPS
ultra83 FPS80 FPS
4K
low110 FPS107 FPS
medium88 FPS86 FPS
high73 FPS71 FPS
ultra55 FPS54 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
1080p
low220 FPS142 FPS
medium176 FPS117 FPS
high147 FPS100 FPS
ultra110 FPS85 FPS
1440p
low165 FPS104 FPS
medium132 FPS86 FPS
high110 FPS74 FPS
ultra83 FPS59 FPS
4K
low110 FPS62 FPS
medium86 FPS48 FPS
high73 FPS38 FPS
ultra55 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

NVIDIA

CMP 30HX

The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

AMD

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,765 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 reaches 4,765 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
G3D Mark Score
4,892+3%
4,765
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1408
1792+27%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.027 TFLOPS+75%
2.867 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1785 MHz+43%
1250 MHz
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
88
112+27%
L1 Cache
1.4 MB+218%
0.44 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+100%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
3 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
384-bit+500%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+100%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Decoder: No vs UVD 3.2.

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
No
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280's 200W — a 46.2% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 278mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
TDP
125W-38%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
229mm
278mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
39.1+64%
23.8
💰

Value Analysis

The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 costs 65.1% less ($520 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 17.1 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) — the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 offers 180.3% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).

FeatureCMP 30HXRadeon HD 7950 / R9 280
MSRP
$799
$279-65%
Performance per Dollar
6.1
17.1+180%
Codename
TU116
Tahiti
Release
February 25 2021
January 31 2012
Ranking
#447
#454