
CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 30HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 278mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌186.4% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 17.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $520 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.1 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
- ❌21.4% longer card at 278mm vs 229mm.
CMP 30HX
2021Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
2012Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 278mm, a 49mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $520 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.1 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌186.4% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 17.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
- ❌21.4% longer card at 278mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is CMP 30HX better than Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 12 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 54 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,765 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 reaches 4,765 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892+3% | 4,765 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1792+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS+75% | 2.867 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+43% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 112+27% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+218% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+100% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 30HX comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) — the CMP 30HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+100% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (CMP 30HX) vs 12 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 30HX) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Decoder: No vs UVD 3.2.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | No | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280's 200W — a 46.2% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 278mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-38% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 278mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+64% | 23.8 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 costs 65.1% less ($520 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (CMP 30HX) vs 17.1 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) — the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 offers 180.3% better value. The CMP 30HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).
| Feature | CMP 30HX | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $279-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 17.1+180% |
| Codename | TU116 | Tahiti |
| Release | February 25 2021 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #447 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












