
CMP 30HX vs RTXA5000-24Q

CMP 30HX
Popular choices:

RTXA5000-24Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The CMP 30HX is positioned at rank 190 and the RTXA5000-24Q is on rank 331, so the CMP 30HX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar CMP 30HX
Performance Per Dollar RTXA5000-24Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The CMP 30HX is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTXA5000-24Q.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 30HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $2,100 for the RTXA5000-24Q, it costs 97% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 3464.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3464.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($60) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 30HX and RTXA5000-24Q

CMP 30HX
The CMP 30HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,892 points. Launch price was $799.

RTXA5000-24Q
The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The CMP 30HX scores 4,892 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 30HX is built on Turing while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (CMP 30HX) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (CMP 30HX) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,892+2% | 4,803 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 8192+482% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+452% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+5% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 256+191% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 8 MB+471% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 6 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (CMP 30HX) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 6 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 30HX draws 125W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 59.2% difference. The CMP 30HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (CMP 30HX) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-46% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+87% | 20.9 |
Value Analysis
The CMP 30HX launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721 and now averages $2100. The CMP 30HX costs 97.1% less ($2040 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 81.5 (CMP 30HX) vs 2.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the CMP 30HX offers 3443.5% better value.
| Feature | CMP 30HX | RTXA5000-24Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-79% | $3721 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60-97% | $2100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.5+3443% | 2.3 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA102 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #447 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














