CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 290X

CMP 40HX

2021Core: 1470 MHzBoost: 1650 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290X

2013Boost: 947 MHz
Similar parts
·······

CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 290X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 290X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

CMP 40HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 185W instead of 350W, a 165W reduction.
  • Measures 229mm instead of 275mm, a 46mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 27.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Radeon R9 290X

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 22.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 89.2% higher power demand at 350W vs 185W.
  • 20.1% longer card at 275mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
CMP 40HX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.8% in PassMark G3D (8,749 vs 8,426), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
CMP 40HX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm, 36 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 290X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $549 vs $699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 22.6% (15.3 vs 12.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 290X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, CMP 40HX has the stronger long-term case.

CMP 40HX vs Radeon R9 290X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

CMP 40HX

The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon R9 290X

The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The CMP 40HX scores 8,749 and the Radeon R9 290X reaches 8,426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 947 MHz.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon R9 290X
G3D Mark Score
8,749+4%
8,426
Architecture
Turing
GCN 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304
2816+22%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.603 TFLOPS+35%
5.632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1650 MHz+74%
947 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144
176+22%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+233%
0.69 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon R9 290X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the CMP 40HX and 512-bit on the Radeon R9 290X. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon R9 290X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
512-bit+300%
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon R9 290X
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.0
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: No vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon R9 290X
Encoder
No
VCE 2.0
Decoder
No
UVD 4.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 61.7% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 95°C.

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon R9 290X
TDP
185W-47%
350W
Recommended PSU
500W-33%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
229mm
275mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-16%
95°C
Perf/Watt
47.3+96%
24.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the CMP 40HX came in at $699, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. On MSRP, Radeon R9 290X was 21.5% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon R9 290X offers 22.4% better value. The newer card here is CMP 40HX (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureCMP 40HXRadeon R9 290X
MSRP
$699
$549-21%
Performance per Dollar
12.5
15.3+22%
Codename
TU106
Hawaii
Release
February 25 2021
October 24 2013
Ranking
#302
#342

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.