Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-10400F

Intel

Core i3-1115G4E

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020
Core family
·······

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-1115G4E

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU), while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (5,231 vs 13,029).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +96.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Costs $53 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
  • Delivers 231.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
  • 300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-1115G4E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core i3-1115G4E?
Yes. Core i5-10400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 96.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 149.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 96.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 149.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-10400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-10400F comes in $53 cheaper on MSRP at $160 MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 96.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 231.6% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 24.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-10400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-1115G4E vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-1115G4E

The Core i3-1115G4E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, LPDDR4X. Passmark benchmark score: 5,231 points. Launch price was $285.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Processing Power

The Core i3-1115G4E packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-1115G4E versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-1115G4E uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-1115G4E scores 5,231 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 85.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,506 vs 1,454, a 3.5% lead for the Core i3-1115G4E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-1115G4E vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

FeatureCore i3-1115G4ECore i5-10400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
256K (per core)+20380%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
5,231
13,029+149%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,506+4%
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-1115G4E uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i3-1115G4E versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i3-1115G4E supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i3-1115G4E) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i3-1115G4ECore i5-10400F
Socket
FCBGA1449
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200+20%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
4
16+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i3-1115G4E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-1115G4E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Core i3-1115G4E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-1115G4E targets Embedded, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i3-1115G4E rivals Ryzen Embedded V2516; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCore i3-1115G4ECore i5-10400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (48 EU)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Embedded
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-1115G4E was priced at $213, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($213 vs $160), Core i5-10400F was $53 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-1115G4E delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 107.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-1115G4ECore i5-10400F
MSRP
$213
$160-25%
Performance per Dollar
24.6
81.4+231%
Release Date
2020
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.