
EPYC 7302

Ryzen 7 3700X
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7302
2019Why buy it
- ✅+49.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($978 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 99.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 34.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $978 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 33,499).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7302, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than EPYC 7302?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7302 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7302
The EPYC 7302 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 33,499 points. Launch price was $978.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7302 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7302 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7302 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7302 scores 33,499 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 39.6% lead for the EPYC 7302. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 33,499+49% | 22,430 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,192 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,254 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7302 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7302 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7302) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7302) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 7302 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80,SP3 (EPYC 7302) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: EPYC 7302 targets Server / Multi-thread Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7302 rivals Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV | — |
| Target Use | Server / Multi-thread Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7302 was priced at $978, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($978 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $649 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7302 delivers 34.3 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 66.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7302 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $978 | $329-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3 | 68.2+99% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














