EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6338T

AMD

EPYC 7303P

16 Cores32 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
EPYC family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6338T

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6338T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6338T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6338T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7303P

2023

Why buy it

  • +1.9% higher PassMark.
  • +77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
  • Costs $2,545 less on MSRP ($594 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
  • Delivers 438.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 61.4 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($594 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
  • Draws 130W instead of 165W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6338T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Gold 6338T

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (35,801 vs 36,487).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($3,139 MSRP vs $594 MSRP).
  • 26.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7303P better than Xeon Gold 6338T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6338T is ahead with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark. EPYC 7303P also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7303P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 7303P is the better buy right now. EPYC 7303P comes in $2,545 cheaper on MSRP at $594 MSRP versus $3,139 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6338T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 438.6% better value on MSRP (61.4 vs 11.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7303P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 7303P vs Xeon Gold 6338T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 7303P

The EPYC 7303P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 36,487 points. Launch price was $594.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6338T

The Xeon Gold 6338T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,801 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7303P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6338T offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6338T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7303P versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338T — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7303P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7303P scores 36,487 against the Xeon Gold 6338T's 35,801 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 7303P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7303P vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6338T.

FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6338T
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+78%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
7 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark
36,487+2%
35,801
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7303P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6338T uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6338T supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7303P) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6338T) — the EPYC 7303P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7303P) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6338T).

FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6338T
Socket
SP3
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
6144+50%
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 7303P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6338T). Direct competitor: EPYC 7303P rivals Xeon Gold 6330; Xeon Gold 6338T rivals EPYC 7443P.

FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6338T
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, IOMMU
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 7303P was priced at $594, while the Xeon Gold 6338T came in at $3139. On launch pricing ($594 vs $3139), EPYC 7303P was $2545 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7303P delivers 61.4 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6338T — making the EPYC 7303P the 137.4% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 7303PXeon Gold 6338T
MSRP
$594-81%
$3139
Performance per Dollar
61.4+439%
11.4
Release Date
2023
2021

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.