EPYC 7371
VS
Core i9-14901E

EPYC 7371 vs Core i9-14901E

AMD

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i9-14901E

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7371

#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
102%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
102%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
102%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
101%
#109
EPYC 7371
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
99%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-14901E

#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
107%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
107%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
107%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
107%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
105%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
105%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
103%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
103%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
102%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
102%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
102%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
102%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
101%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
101%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
101%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
100%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
100%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
99%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
98%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
98%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
98%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
97%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
94%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
94%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
89%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
89%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
87%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
85%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
83%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
81%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i9-14901E (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7371Core i9-14901E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($689)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7371 (2018) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7371Core i9-14901E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($689)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7371 and Core i9-14901E

AMD

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Intel

Core i9-14901E

The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core i9-14901E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E — a 38.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-14901E uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Core i9-14901E's 30,298 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-14901E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,216 vs 2,894, a 81.7% lead for the Core i9-14901E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,941 vs 14,262 (69.1% advantage for the Core i9-14901E). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E.

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i9-14901E
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
5.6 GHz+47%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+11%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+78%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
2 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark
30,156
30,298
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,216
2,894+138%
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,941
14,262+105%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-14901E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E — the Core i9-14901E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 2 (Core i9-14901E). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 20 (Core i9-14901E) — the EPYC 7371 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E).

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i9-14901E
Socket
TR4
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-5600+25%
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB+967%
192 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs Yes (Core i9-14901E). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7371 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i9-14901E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
Yes
Target Use
High-frequency Server Workloads