EPYC 7371
VS
Core i5-12400F

EPYC 7371 vs Core i5-12400F

AMD

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7371

#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
102%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
102%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
102%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
101%
#109
EPYC 7371
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
99%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F

#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
115%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
106%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
104%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
103%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
99%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
93%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
91%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
90%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7371 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7371Core i5-12400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-12400F ($110), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($110 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7371Core i5-12400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7371 and Core i5-12400F

AMD

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 42.8% lead for the EPYC 7371. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 12,380 (19.1% advantage for the EPYC 7371). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,216 vs 1,700, a 33.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,941 vs 657 (165.4% advantage for the EPYC 7371). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+167%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz+16%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+24%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+256%
18 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
30,156+54%
19,532
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000+21%
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,216
1,700+40%
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,941+956%
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 2 (Core i5-12400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the EPYC 7371 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i5-12400F
Socket
TR4
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25%
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB+1500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+540%
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-frequency Server Workloads
Gaming Performance/Value