EPYC 7371
VS
Core i9-9960X

EPYC 7371 vs Core i9-9960X

AMD

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i9-9960X

16 Cores32 Thrd165 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7371

#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
102%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
102%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
102%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
101%
#109
EPYC 7371
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
99%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-9960X

#46
Core i5-13490F
MSRP: $235|Avg: $170
105%
#47
Ryzen 5 5600F
MSRP: $99|Avg: $129
105%
#48
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
104%
#49
Ryzen 3 4300GE
MSRP: $94|Avg: $72
104%
#50
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
104%
#51
Core Ultra 5 225
MSRP: $240|Avg: $200
104%
#52
Core i5-11500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $110
104%
#53
Core i3-12100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $90
104%
#54
Core Ultra 7 265
MSRP: $384|Avg: $320
104%
#55
Ryzen 7 5800X
MSRP: $449|Avg: $180
103%
#56
Core i5-11400F
MSRP: $157|Avg: $110
103%
#57
Ryzen 7 5700G
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
102%
#58
Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $175
102%
#59
Core i5-9500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $65
101%
#60
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
100%
#61
Core i9-9960X
MSRP: $1684|Avg: $200
100%
#62
Core Ultra 5 225T
MSRP: $240|Avg: $180
100%
#63
Ryzen 3 3300X
MSRP: $120|Avg: $90
100%
#64
Core i5-12600K
MSRP: $289|Avg: $185
100%
#65
Core Ultra 5 235
MSRP: $257|Avg: $269
99%
#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
99%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
99%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
99%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
98%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
98%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
97%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
97%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
97%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
97%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
97%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7371 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 7371Core i9-9960X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-9960X ($200), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($200 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 7371Core i9-9960X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7371 and Core i9-9960X

AMD

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Intel

Core i9-9960X

The Core i9-9960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,927 points. Launch price was $1,684.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7371 and Core i9-9960X share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9960X — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-9960X (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-9960X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Core i9-9960X's 29,927 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 7371. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,216 vs 1,650, a 30.3% lead for the Core i9-9960X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,941 vs 10,700 (42.6% advantage for the Core i9-9960X). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 22 MB (total) on the Core i9-9960X.

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i9-9960X
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz+18%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+191%
22 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
30,156
29,927
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,216
1,650+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,941
10,700+54%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-9960X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 4 (Core i9-9960X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 44 (Core i9-9960X) — the EPYC 7371 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and X299 (Core i9-9960X).

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i9-9960X
Socket
TR4
LGA2066
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB+1500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
8+100%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+191%
44
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-9960X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9960X). Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Core i9-9960X targets HEDT. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.

FeatureEPYC 7371Core i9-9960X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-frequency Server Workloads
HEDT