EPYC 7371
VS
Core Ultra 5 235H

EPYC 7371 vs Core Ultra 5 235H

AMD

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

14 Cores14 Thrd20 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7371

#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
102%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
102%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
102%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
101%
#109
EPYC 7371
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
99%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 235H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
128%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
120%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
118%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
113%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
108%
#25
Core Ultra 5 235H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
98%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
91%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 5 235H (2025) utilizes 5 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7371Core Ultra 5 235H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7371 (2018) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7371Core Ultra 5 235H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7371 and Core Ultra 5 235H

AMD

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235H

The Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 20 MB + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 29,820 points. Launch price was $354.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 235H offers 14 cores / 14 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235H — a 27.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H (base: 3.1 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Core Ultra 5 235H's 29,820 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7371. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 17,607 (16% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,216 vs 2,693, a 75.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 235H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,941 vs 14,040 (67.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 235H). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 18 MB on the Core Ultra 5 235H.

FeatureEPYC 7371Core Ultra 5 235H
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+14%
14 / 14
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
5 GHz+32%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
4.4 GHz+42%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+256%
18 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
5 nm-64%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Arrow Lake-H (2025)
PassMark
30,156+1%
29,820
Cinebench R23 Multi
15,000
17,607+17%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,216
2,693+121%
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,941
14,040+102%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235H — the Core Ultra 5 235H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 235H). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 28 (Core Ultra 5 235H) — the EPYC 7371 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and WM880,HM870 (Core Ultra 5 235H).

FeatureEPYC 7371Core Ultra 5 235H
Socket
TR4
FCBGA2049
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB+967%
192 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+357%
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 235H). The Core Ultra 5 235H includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140T Graphics), while the EPYC 7371 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Core Ultra 5 235H targets Thin-and-light Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134; Core Ultra 5 235H rivals Ryzen 7 9800H.

FeatureEPYC 7371Core Ultra 5 235H
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc 140T Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High-frequency Server Workloads
Thin-and-light Performance Laptop