EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen 5 3600

CPU

GPU

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 7371

16 / 32

30,156

+70.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX

Ryzen 5 3600

6 / 12

17,685

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 7371

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7371.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7371 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 15,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7371, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7371 better than Ryzen 5 3600?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7371 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 3600 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7371 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7371 is the stronger fit. You are getting 57.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7371 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3600 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 7371 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 7371 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7371 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7371 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7371 scores 30,156 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 52.1% lead for the EPYC 7371. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,000 vs 9,500 (44.9% advantage for the EPYC 7371). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,216 vs 1,295, a 6.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,941 vs 1,898 (114.1% advantage for the EPYC 7371). L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	EPYC 7371	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.2 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+16%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+100%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture	Naples (2017−2018)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	30,156+71%	17,685
Cinebench R23 Multi	15,000+58%	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	1,216	1,295+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi	6,941+266%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7371 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7371) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7371) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the EPYC 7371 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 platform (EPYC 7371) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	EPYC 7371	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	TR4	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB+1500%	128 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.