EPYC 7451
VS
Core Ultra 5 225T

EPYC 7451 vs Core Ultra 5 225T

AMD

EPYC 7451

24 Cores48 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 225T

10 Cores10 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7451

#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
13%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
12%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
147%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
131%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
101%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
101%
#18
EPYC 7451
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
92%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
91%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225T

#47
Ryzen 5 5600F
MSRP: $99|Avg: $129
105%
#48
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
105%
#49
Ryzen 3 4300GE
MSRP: $94|Avg: $72
105%
#50
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
104%
#51
Core Ultra 5 225
MSRP: $240|Avg: $200
104%
#52
Core i5-11500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $110
104%
#53
Core i3-12100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $90
104%
#54
Core Ultra 7 265
MSRP: $384|Avg: $320
104%
#55
Ryzen 7 5800X
MSRP: $449|Avg: $180
103%
#56
Core i5-11400F
MSRP: $157|Avg: $110
103%
#57
Ryzen 7 5700G
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
102%
#58
Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $175
102%
#59
Core i5-9500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $65
101%
#60
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
101%
#61
Core i9-9960X
MSRP: $1684|Avg: $200
100%
#62
Core Ultra 5 225T
MSRP: $240|Avg: $180
100%
#63
Ryzen 3 3300X
MSRP: $120|Avg: $90
100%
#64
Core i5-12600K
MSRP: $289|Avg: $185
100%
#65
Core Ultra 5 235
MSRP: $257|Avg: $269
99%
#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
99%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
99%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
99%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
99%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
98%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
97%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
97%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
97%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
97%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
71%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
97%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core Ultra 5 225T (2025) utilizes 3 nm technology and DDR5-6400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightEPYC 7451Core Ultra 5 225T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7451 (2017) relies on 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightEPYC 7451Core Ultra 5 225T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7451 and Core Ultra 5 225T

AMD

EPYC 7451

The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225T

The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7451 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T — a 42% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7451 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7451 scores 26,639 against the Core Ultra 5 225T's 26,874 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T.

FeatureEPYC 7451Core Ultra 5 225T
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+140%
10 / 10
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.9 GHz+53%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+220%
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
3 MB (per core)+500%
Process
14 nm
3 nm-79%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
26,639
26,874
Geekbench 6 Single
2,677
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,943
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7451 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225T uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7451Core Ultra 5 225T
Socket
TR4
LGA1851
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7451) / VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T). The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the EPYC 7451 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

FeatureEPYC 7451Core Ultra 5 225T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc Graphics (16EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget