EPYC 7452 vs EPYC 73F3
EPYC 7452
EPYC 73F3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7452
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 73F3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,025) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,025) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7452 and EPYC 73F3
EPYC 7452
The EPYC 7452 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 45,764 points. Launch price was $2,025.
EPYC 73F3
The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7452 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the EPYC 73F3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7452 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7452 versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 73F3 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 7452 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the EPYC 73F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 7452 scores 45,764 against the EPYC 73F3's 46,103 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7452 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 4 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+59% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 45,764 | 46,103 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7452 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 73F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7452) and SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3).
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7452) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 73F3). Direct competitor: EPYC 7452 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7452 launched at $2025 MSRP, while the EPYC 73F3 debuted at $3521. At current prices ($2025 vs $2100), the EPYC 7452 is $75 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7452 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 73F3 — making the EPYC 7452 the 2.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7452 | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2025-42% | $3521 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2025-4% | $2100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.6+3% | 22.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 7452 and EPYC 73F3
