
EPYC 7F72

Ryzen 5 5600X
EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 5 5600X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 7F72
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($2,131 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β269.2% higher power demand at 240W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $1,832 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).
- β Delivers 194.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.1 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,131 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 240W, a 175W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7F72 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,845 vs 52,840).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7F72, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7F72 better than Ryzen 5 5600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7F72 vs Ryzen 5 5600X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 7F72
The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017β2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.


Ryzen 5 5600X
The Ryzen 5 5600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,845 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7F72 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the EPYC 7F72 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600X β a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600X (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7F72 uses the Zen 2 (2017β2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F72 scores 52,840 against the Ryzen 5 5600X's 21,845 β a 83% lead for the EPYC 7F72. L3 cache: 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+300% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 192 MB (total)+500% | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017β2020) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 52,840+142% | 21,845 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F72 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7F72 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7F72) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 5600X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7F72) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600X) β the EPYC 7F72 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7F72) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 5 5600X).
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7F72) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 7F72 was priced at $2131, while the Ryzen 5 5600X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($2131 vs $299), Ryzen 5 5600X was $1832 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7F72 delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 73.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 5600X β making the Ryzen 5 5600X the 98.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7F72 | Ryzen 5 5600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2131 | $299-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8 | 73.1+195% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














