EPYC 8124P vs Xeon W-3265M

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8124P

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon W-3265M

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon W-3265M Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8124P

16 / 32

36,079

+1.6%

Ryzen Embedded V3C48

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon W-3265M

24 / 48

35,506

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon W-3265M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon W-3265M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8124P

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
✅Costs $5,661 less on MSRP ($639 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 901.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($639 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3265M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon W-3265M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (35,506 vs 36,079).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $639 MSRP).
❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 8124P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8124P better than Xeon W-3265M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon W-3265M is ahead with a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8124P pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. EPYC 8124P also has the bigger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8124P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8124P is the better buy right now. EPYC 8124P comes in $5,661 cheaper on MSRP at $639 MSRP versus $6,300 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon W-3265M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 901.8% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8124P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, 93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8124P vs Xeon W-3265M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8124P

The EPYC 8124P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,079 points. Launch price was $639.

Xeon W-3265M

The Xeon W-3265M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,506 points. Launch price was $6,353.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8124P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3265M offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon W-3265M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8124P versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265M — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265M (base: 2.45 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 8124P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3265M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8124P scores 36,079 against the Xeon W-3265M's 35,506 — a 1.6% lead for the EPYC 8124P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8124P vs 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265M.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon W-3265M
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock	2.45 GHz	2.7 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+94%	33 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	36,079+2%	35,506

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8124P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3265M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8124P versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3265M — the EPYC 8124P supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8124P supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 1024 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8124P) vs 64 (Xeon W-3265M) — the EPYC 8124P offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8124P) and C620 (Xeon W-3265M).

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon W-3265M
Socket	SP6	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800+64%	2933
Max RAM Capacity	2048+100%	1024
RAM Channels	6	6
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96+50%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 8124P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3265M). Direct competitor: EPYC 8124P rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y; Xeon W-3265M rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon W-3265M
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, IOMMU	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8124P was priced at $639, while the Xeon W-3265M came in at $6300. On launch pricing ($639 vs $6300), EPYC 8124P was $5661 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8124P delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3265M — making the EPYC 8124P the 163.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8124P	Xeon W-3265M
MSRP	$639-90%	$6300
Performance per Dollar	56.5+909%	5.6
Release Date	2023	2019

Search EPYC 8124P on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3265M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.