CPU
GPU
EPYC 8224P
EPYC 73F3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8224P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 73F3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 8224P | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 8224P | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+97%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8224P and EPYC 73F3
EPYC 8224P
The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.
EPYC 73F3
The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8224P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 73F3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8224P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the EPYC 73F3 (base: 2.55 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The EPYC 8224P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the EPYC 73F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 8224P scores 45,421 against the EPYC 73F3's 46,103 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 2.55 GHz | 3.5 GHz+37% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 45,421 | 46,103+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8224P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 73F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8224P versus 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 — the EPYC 8224P supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8224P) vs 8 (EPYC 73F3). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8224P) vs 128 (EPYC 73F3) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8224P) and SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3).
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152 | 4096+256% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 96 | 128+33% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 73F3). Direct competitor: EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 8224P launched at $855 MSRP, while the EPYC 73F3 debuted at $3521. At current prices ($1048 vs $2100), the EPYC 8224P is $1052 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8224P delivers 43.3 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 73F3 — making the EPYC 8224P the 65.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 8224P | EPYC 73F3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $855-76% | $3521 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1048-50% | $2100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.3+97% | 22.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8224P and EPYC 73F3
