EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w5-3535X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w5-3535X

20 Cores40 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w5-3535X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 8324P

32 / 64

57,127

+2.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w5-3535X

20 / 40

55,532

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w5-3535X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w5-3535X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.9% higher PassMark.
✅+143.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 53 MB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3535X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).

Xeon w5-3535X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $196 less on MSRP ($1,699 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅Delivers 8.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (55,532 vs 57,127).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 128 MB).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3535X better than EPYC 8324P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon w5-3535X is ahead with a 14.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8324P pulls ahead with 2.9% better PassMark. EPYC 8324P also has the bigger cache pool with 143.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8324P is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 143.8% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 53 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3535X is the better buy right now. Xeon w5-3535X comes in $196 cheaper on MSRP at $1,699 MSRP versus $1,895 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 8324P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.9% better PassMark. It is also 8.4% better value on MSRP (32.7 vs 30.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3535X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 8324P vs Xeon w5-3535X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

Xeon w5-3535X

The Xeon w5-3535X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 55,532 points. Launch price was $1,689.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon w5-3535X offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3535X — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3535X (base: 2.65 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon w5-3535X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Xeon w5-3535X's 55,532 — a 2.8% lead for the EPYC 8324P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 52.5 MB on the Xeon w5-3535X.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon w5-3535X
Cores / Threads	32 / 64+60%	20 / 40
Boost Clock	3 GHz	4.8 GHz+60%
Base Clock	2.65 GHz	2.9 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+144%	52.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Siena (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	57,127+3%	55,532
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	30,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3535X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon w5-3535X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1152 GB — 255.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 4 (Xeon w5-3535X). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3535X) — the Xeon w5-3535X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and W790 (Xeon w5-3535X).

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon w5-3535X
Socket	SP6	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	4800	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	1152 GB	4096 GB+256%
RAM Channels	6+50%	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	96	112+17%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon w5-3535X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon w5-3535X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Xeon w5-3535X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon w5-3535X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Xeon w5-3535X came in at $1699. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $1699), Xeon w5-3535X was $196 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 8324P delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3535X — making the Xeon w5-3535X the 8.1% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 8324P	Xeon w5-3535X
MSRP	$1895	$1699-10%
Performance per Dollar	30.1	32.7+9%
Release Date	2023	2024

Search EPYC 8324P on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3535X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.