EPYC 8324PN
VS
Core i3-10305T

EPYC 8324PN vs Core i3-10305T

AMD

EPYC 8324PN

32 Cores64 Thrd130 WWMax: 3 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i3-10305T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The EPYC 8324PN is positioned at rank #613 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8324PN

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9925%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1874%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1665%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1286%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
99%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
98%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
96%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
96%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
94%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
94%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
94%
#613
EPYC 8324PN
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#618
Xeon W-2133
MSRP: $617|Avg: $617
98%
#622
Xeon E5607
MSRP: $135|Avg: $27
95%
#626
Xeon Silver 4209T
MSRP: $563|Avg: $649
94%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10305T

#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
108%
#303
Core i7-5960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $83
23%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
17%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
107%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
107%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
106%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
106%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
103%
#309
Core i9-9900T
MSRP: $423|Avg: $215
103%
#310
Core i5-9500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $132
103%
#311
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
101%
#312
Core i9-10940X
MSRP: $784|Avg: $460
101%
#313
Core i9-10920X
MSRP: $689|Avg: $430
101%
#314
Core i7-10700
MSRP: $365|Avg: $268
101%
#315
Core i5-9600K
MSRP: $263|Avg: $178
100%
#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
100%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
100%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
98%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
98%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
98%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
97%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
97%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
95%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
95%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
94%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
93%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
93%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
93%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
92%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 8324PN is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 8324PNCore i3-10305T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($143)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-R (2021) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-10305T ($143), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($143 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 8324PNCore i3-10305T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($143)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 8324PN and Core i3-10305T

AMD

EPYC 8324PN

The EPYC 8324PN is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,375 points. Launch price was $2,125.

Intel

Core i3-10305T

The Core i3-10305T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,512 points. Launch price was $143.

Processing Power

The EPYC 8324PN packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Core i3-10305T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the EPYC 8324PN has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324PN versus 4 GHz on the Core i3-10305T — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-10305T (base: 2.05 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 8324PN uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Core i3-10305T uses Comet Lake-R (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324PN scores 8,375 against the Core i3-10305T's 8,512 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i3-10305T. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324PN vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i3-10305T.

FeatureEPYC 8324PNCore i3-10305T
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+700%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2.05 GHz
3 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+1500%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Siena (2023−2024)
Comet Lake-R (2021)
PassMark
8,375
8,512+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 8324PN uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-10305T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 8324PNCore i3-10305T
Socket
SP6
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0