EPYC 9174F
VS
Core i7-9700K

EPYC 9174F vs Core i7-9700K

AMD

EPYC 9174F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9174F

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
772%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
6%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
14%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
13%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
12%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
146%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
129%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
91%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
90%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-9700K

#259
Core i3-9100TE
MSRP: $122|Avg: $60
106%
#260
Core i5-12500T
MSRP: $302|Avg: $214
106%
#261
Core i9-13900
MSRP: $549|Avg: $599
105%
#262
Core i7-11700
MSRP: $323|Avg: $274
105%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
53%
#263
Core i9-13900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $570
104%
#264
Processor 300T
MSRP: $82|Avg: $82
103%
#265
Athlon 3000G
MSRP: $49|Avg: $60
103%
#266
Athlon 220GE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $60
103%
#267
Ryzen 9 3900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $441
102%
#268
Core i5-10500
MSRP: $200|Avg: $178
102%
#269
Celeron G6900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
102%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
101%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
101%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
100%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
45%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
100%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
99%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
99%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
98%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
43%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
98%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
40%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
98%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
40%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
97%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
97%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
38%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($30) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9174F is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 9174FCore i7-9700K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-9700K ($200), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($170 less, 567% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 9174FCore i7-9700K
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2319%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9174F and Core i7-9700K

AMD

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core i7-9700K offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the EPYC 9174F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Core i7-9700K uses Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Core i7-9700K's 14,397 — a 113.6% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K.

FeatureEPYC 9174FCore i7-9700K
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz+11%
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+14%
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+2033%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
PassMark
52,249+263%
14,397
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-9700K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9174F versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K — the EPYC 9174F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 2 (Core i7-9700K). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 16 (Core i7-9700K) — the EPYC 9174F offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K).

FeatureEPYC 9174FCore i7-9700K
Socket
SP5
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+119900%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
6144
128 GB+2184433%
RAM Channels
12+500%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+700%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9174F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the EPYC 9174F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

FeatureEPYC 9174FCore i7-9700K
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9174F launched at $194 MSRP, while the Core i7-9700K debuted at $385. At current prices ($30 vs $200), the EPYC 9174F is $170 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9174F delivers 1741.6 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Core i7-9700K — making the EPYC 9174F the 184.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9174FCore i7-9700K
MSRP
$194-50%
$385
Avg Price (30d)
$30-85%
$200
Performance per Dollar
1741.6+2319%
72.0
Release Date
2022
2018