EPYC 9174F vs EPYC 7F72
EPYC 9174F
EPYC 7F72
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9174F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F72
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9174F | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,131) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9174F | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6924%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,131) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9174F and EPYC 7F72
EPYC 9174F
The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.
EPYC 7F72
The EPYC 7F72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 192 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 52,840 points. Launch price was $2,450.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7F72 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7F72 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7F72 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9174F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 7F72 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the EPYC 7F72's 52,840 — a 1.1% lead for the EPYC 7F72. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 192 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F72.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+28% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+33% | 192 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 52,249 | 52,840+1% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7F72 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9174F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7F72 — the EPYC 9174F supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 8 (EPYC 7F72). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and SP3 (EPYC 7F72).
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9174F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; EPYC 7F72 rivals Xeon Platinum 8260.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9174F launched at $194 MSRP, while the EPYC 7F72 debuted at $2131. At current prices ($30 vs $2131), the EPYC 9174F is $2101 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9174F delivers 1741.6 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7F72 — making the EPYC 9174F the 194.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | EPYC 7F72 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $194-91% | $2131 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-99% | $2131 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1741.6+6923% | 24.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9174F and EPYC 7F72
