Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 9174F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 9174F
16 / 32
52,249
+132.9%
brand logoRyzen 9 7940H
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 7745
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen 9 5950X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9970X
Ryzen 7 3700X
8 / 16
22,430
0.0%
brand logoRyzen 3 PRO 7330U
brand logoRyzen 7 PRO 4750U
brand logoRyzen 7 4980U
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 220
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9900X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low212 FPS
medium174 FPS
high149 FPS
ultra108 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low200 FPS
medium163 FPS
high137 FPS
ultra110 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low713 FPS
medium612 FPS
high493 FPS
ultra428 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium525 FPS
high428 FPS
ultra383 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low814 FPS
medium686 FPS
high637 FPS
ultra557 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium561 FPS
high561 FPS
ultra561 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low1164 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high889 FPS
ultra801 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low561 FPS
medium561 FPS
high561 FPS
ultra561 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low374 FPS
medium289 FPS
high264 FPS
ultra229 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low293 FPS
medium221 FPS
high193 FPS
ultra173 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low308 FPS
medium276 FPS
high216 FPS
ultra182 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low298 FPS
medium265 FPS
high209 FPS
ultra173 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low362 FPS
medium320 FPS
high280 FPS
ultra240 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low350 FPS
medium300 FPS
high258 FPS
ultra220 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 9174F
low286 FPS
medium265 FPS
high223 FPS
ultra209 FPS
1080P
Ryzen 7 3700X
low236 FPS
medium220 FPS
high186 FPS
ultra174 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 9174F

2022

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • ✅Costs $135 less on MSRP ($194 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 295.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 269.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($194 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • ❌392.3% higher power demand at 320W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 65W instead of 320W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 52,249).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9174F, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 269.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $194 MSRP).
  • ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9174F moves to SP5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9174F better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9174F makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9174F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 32 MB.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9174F is the stronger fit. You are getting 132.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 9174F is the better buy right now. EPYC 9174F comes in $135 cheaper on MSRP at $194 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 295.0% better value on MSRP (269.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9174F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with SP5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 256 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9174F packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9174F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 79.9% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureEPYC 9174FRyzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+14%
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+700%
32 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+51100%
Process
5 nm, 6 nm-29%
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
52,249+133%
22,430
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9174F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the EPYC 9174F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the EPYC 9174F offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

FeatureEPYC 9174FRyzen 7 3700X
Socket
SP5
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+50%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
6144 GB+4700%
128 GB
RAM Channels
12+500%
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+433%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9174F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

FeatureEPYC 9174FRyzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
—
Unlocked
No
—
AVX-512
Yes
—
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
—
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 9174F was priced at $194, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($194 vs $329), EPYC 9174F was $135 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9174F delivers 269.3 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the EPYC 9174F the 119.2% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9174FRyzen 7 3700X
MSRP
$194-41%
$329
Performance per Dollar
269.3+295%
68.2
Release Date
2022
2019
Search EPYC 9174F on AmazonSearch Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.