EPYC 9174F
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9174F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $194 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌481.8% higher power demand at 320W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 320W, a 265W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while EPYC 9174F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9174F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (51,646 vs 52,249).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9174F, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9174F better than Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9174F
The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 51,646 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+37% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+300% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 52,249+1% | 51,646 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9174F versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — the EPYC 9174F offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395).
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 8000+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+4700% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+700% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9174F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the EPYC 9174F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9174F was priced at $194, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($194 vs $0), Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 was $194 cheaper.
| Feature | EPYC 9174F | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $194 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 269.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
