EPYC 9174F
VS
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

AMD

EPYC 9174F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9174F

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
772%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
6%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
14%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
13%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
12%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
146%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
129%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
91%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
90%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($30) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9174F is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 9174FRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm)
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($30 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 9174FRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

AMD

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 9174F and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 9174F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9174F scores 52,249 against the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 51,646 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.

FeatureEPYC 9174FRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+37%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+300%
64 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm, 6 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Genoa (2022−2023)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
52,249+1%
51,646
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9174F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9174F versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9174F) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9174F) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — the EPYC 9174F offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9174F) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395).

FeatureEPYC 9174FRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Socket
SP5
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
4800
8000+67%
Max RAM Capacity
6144+4700%
128
RAM Channels
12+200%
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+700%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9174F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the EPYC 9174F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX.

FeatureEPYC 9174FRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
AMD Radeon 8060S
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9174F launched at $194 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 debuted at $0. At current prices ($30 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is $30 cheaper.

FeatureEPYC 9174FRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395
MSRP
$194
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
1741.6
Release Date
2022
2025