EPYC 9254 vs EPYC 75F3
EPYC 9254
EPYC 75F3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9254
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 75F3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9254 | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,799) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9254 | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+154%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,099) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,799) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9254 and EPYC 75F3
EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.
EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 75F3 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 — a 3.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 9254 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.95 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the EPYC 75F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the EPYC 75F3's 64,505 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.15 GHz+4% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.95 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 64,344 | 64,505 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,233 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,023 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 75F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 versus 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 — the EPYC 75F3 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 8 (EPYC 75F3). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and SP3 (EPYC 75F3).
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+157286300% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9254 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 9254) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3). Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9254 launched at $3761 MSRP, while the EPYC 75F3 debuted at $5383. At current prices ($1099 vs $2799), the EPYC 9254 is $1700 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 58.5 pts/$ vs 23.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 75F3 — making the EPYC 9254 the 87% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3761-30% | $5383 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1099-61% | $2799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.5+154% | 23.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9254 and EPYC 75F3
