EPYC 9254
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9254
2022Why buy it
- ✅+20.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($3,761 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,312 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 346.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 76.4 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while EPYC 9254 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,000 vs 18,023).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9254, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than EPYC 9254?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9254 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9254 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 9254 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2.9 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The EPYC 9254 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9254 scores 64,344 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 60.9% lead for the EPYC 9254. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,233 vs 2,700, a 18.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,023 vs 15,000 (18.3% advantage for the EPYC 9254). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.15 GHz | 5 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.4 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+33% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 64,344+88% | 34,293 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,233 | 2,700+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,023+20% | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9254 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9254) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9254) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the EPYC 9254 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9254) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the EPYC 9254 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server, Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9254 was priced at $3761, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($3761 vs $449), Ryzen 7 7800X3D was $3312 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9254 delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — making the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the 126.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9254 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3761 | $449-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.1 | 76.4+347% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9254 and Ryzen 7 7800X3D
