EPYC 9255
VS
Core i5-10400F

EPYC 9255 vs Core i5-10400F

AMD

EPYC 9255

24 Cores48 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9255

#285
Xeon w5-3535X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: N/A
108%
#286
Xeon w5-2465X
MSRP: $1389|Avg: $1499
107%
#287
EPYC 9355P
MSRP: $2998|Avg: $3026
107%
#288
Xeon w7-2595X
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $1600
107%
#289
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
MSRP: $2899|Avg: $2699.99
106%
#290
Xeon Gold 5420+
MSRP: $1848|Avg: $1848
104%
#292
Xeon w7-2575X
MSRP: $1689|Avg: $1860
103%
#294
Xeon Gold 6444Y
MSRP: $3622|Avg: N/A
102%
#295
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
MSRP: $2649|Avg: $2782
102%
#296
Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $965
102%
#297
EPYC 7453
MSRP: $1570|Avg: $1253
102%
#298
Xeon Gold 5418Y
MSRP: $1483|Avg: N/A
101%
#299
Xeon w5-3425
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $1189
100%
#300
EPYC 9255
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $1934
100%
#301
EPYC 8324P
MSRP: $1895|Avg: $3598
99%
#302
Xeon Gold 6414U
MSRP: $2296|Avg: $283
99%
#303
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
MSRP: $2495|Avg: $2495
99%
#304
EPYC 7352
MSRP: $1350|Avg: $725
98%
#305
Xeon w7-2475X
MSRP: $1789|Avg: $2544
98%
#307
Xeon W-3323
MSRP: $949|Avg: $500
97%
#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
96%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
95%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
95%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
94%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
93%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
93%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
93%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F

#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
104%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
102%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
102%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
102%
#96
Core Ultra 5 235T
MSRP: $247|Avg: $247
102%
#97
Ryzen 9 5950X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $350
101%
#98
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $389
101%
#99
Core i5-14400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $199
101%
#100
Core i5-14400
MSRP: $221|Avg: $197
101%
#101
Core i5-13400
MSRP: $221|Avg: $185
101%
#102
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
MSRP: $699|Avg: $486
100%
#103
Core i5-11600
MSRP: $213|Avg: $140
100%
#104
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
MSRP: $259|Avg: $160
100%
#105
Core i9-12900K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $322
100%
#106
Ryzen 7 5800XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $219
100%
#107
Core i5-10400F
MSRP: $160|Avg: $102
100%
#108
Core i9-12900KF
MSRP: $564|Avg: $320
100%
#109
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
100%
#110
Ryzen 5 4600GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $125
100%
#111
Core i5-10500T
MSRP: $226|Avg: $80
99%
#112
Core i5-14600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
99%
#113
Core i7-14700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $330
98%
#114
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
MSRP: $89|Avg: $52
98%
#115
Core i9-14900K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $469
98%
#116
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#117
Core i7-13790F
MSRP: $392|Avg: $350
97%
#118
Core i5-14500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $251
97%
#119
Core i5-11600KF
MSRP: $237|Avg: $157
97%
#120
Ryzen 5 5600XT
MSRP: $192|Avg: $180
97%
#121
Core i5-13600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#122
Core i3-13100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $119
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($1,934) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9255 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightEPYC 9255Core i5-10400F
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,934)
More affordable ($102)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-10400F ($102), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($1,832 less, 95% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightEPYC 9255Core i5-10400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+226%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,934)
More affordable ($102)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9255 and Core i5-10400F

AMD

EPYC 9255

The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Processing Power

The EPYC 9255 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 9255 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 11% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 9255 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9255 scores 75,809 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 141.3% lead for the EPYC 9255. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

FeatureEPYC 9255Core i5-10400F
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+300%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+12%
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
3.25 GHz+12%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
128 MB (total)+967%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Turin (2024)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
75,809+482%
13,029
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9255 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9255 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the EPYC 9255 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9255 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9255) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9255) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the EPYC 9255 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9255) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

FeatureEPYC 9255Core i5-10400F
Socket
SP5
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
4800+119900%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
6144
128 GB+2184433%
RAM Channels
12+500%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
128+700%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9255 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9255) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureEPYC 9255Core i5-10400F
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9255 launched at $2495 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($1934 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $1832 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9255 delivers 39.2 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 106.1% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 9255Core i5-10400F
MSRP
$2495
$160-94%
Avg Price (30d)
$1934
$102-95%
Performance per Dollar
39.2
127.7+226%
Release Date
2024
2020