FirePro 2260 vs Radeon X1950 GT
FirePro 2260
Popular choices:
Radeon X1950 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro 2260 is positioned at rank 360 and the Radeon X1950 GT is on rank 339, so the Radeon X1950 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2260
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1950 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1950 GT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The Radeon X1950 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 2260 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 2260 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1950 GT.
| Insight | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 2260 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon X1950 GT, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 248.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+248.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 2260 and Radeon X1950 GT
FirePro 2260
The FirePro 2260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 113 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon X1950 GT
The Radeon X1950 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2260 scores 113 versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 106 — the FirePro 2260 leads by 6.6%. The FirePro 2260 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon X1950 GT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro 2260) vs 5,120 (Radeon X1950 GT). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2260) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon X1950 GT).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 113+7% | 106 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 5120+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS | 23.8 TFLOPS+2999% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 32 | 320+900% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB+669% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 2260 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1950 GT has 512 MB. The FirePro 2260 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro 2260) vs 4 MB (Radeon X1950 GT) — the Radeon X1950 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 4 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2260) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1950 GT). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 1.0 (FirePro 2260) vs Avivo (Radeon X1950 GT). Decoder: UVD 1.0 vs Avivo.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 1.0 | Avivo |
| Decoder | UVD 1.0 | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 2260 draws 75W versus the Radeon X1950 GT's 335W — a 126.8% difference. The FirePro 2260 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2260) vs 350W (Radeon X1950 GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 230mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-78% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 230mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 1.5+400% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 2260 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon X1950 GT launched at $140 and now averages $49. The FirePro 2260 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.5 (FirePro 2260) vs 2.2 (Radeon X1950 GT) — the FirePro 2260 offers 240.9% better value. The Radeon X1950 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro 2260 | Radeon X1950 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-8% | $140 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5+241% | 2.2 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | Navi 21 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #732 | #25 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 2260 and Radeon X1950 GT
