CPU
GPU
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro M2000 is positioned at rank #323 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 2060 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3213.1% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (6 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M2000.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3213.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3213.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1280.5% better value per dollar than the FirePro M2000.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1280.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M2000 and GeForce RTX 2060
FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro M2000 scores 426 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 3213.1%. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426 | 14,114+3213% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1920+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+530% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 120+200% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 1.9 MB+1088% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M2000) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 6 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 3 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+8% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: UVD 3 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 115.3% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 72.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-73% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-10% | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 88.2+791% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M2000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The FirePro M2000 costs 58.3% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (FirePro M2000) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1283.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-14% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-58% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 117.6+1284% |
| Codename | Heathrow | TU106 |
| Release | July 1 2012 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #710 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M2000 and GeForce RTX 2060
