CPU
GPU
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8570D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro M2000 is positioned at rank 323 and the Radeon HD 8570D is on rank 123, so the Radeon HD 8570D offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8570D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8570D.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8570D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8570D holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 223.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+223.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M2000 and Radeon HD 8570D
FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
Radeon HD 8570D
The Radeon HD 8570D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 413 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the Radeon HD 8570D reaches 413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8570D uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8570D). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8570D).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426+3% | 413 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+150% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8570D has 512 MB. The FirePro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M2000) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8570D) — the Radeon HD 8570D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 11 (Radeon HD 8570D). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4+5% |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs UVD3 (Radeon HD 8570D). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,MVC,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 8570D).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | UVD3 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MVC,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the Radeon HD 8570D's 200W — a 129.2% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8570D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-79% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9+371% | 2.1 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M2000 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon HD 8570D launched at $40 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 8570D costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (FirePro M2000) vs 27.5 (Radeon HD 8570D) — the Radeon HD 8570D offers 223.5% better value.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $40-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 27.5+224% |
| Codename | Heathrow | Pitcairn |
| Release | July 1 2012 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #710 | #460 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M2000 and Radeon HD 8570D
