
FirePro M2000

Radeon HD 8570D
FirePro M2000 vs Radeon HD 8570D Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M2000 vs Radeon HD 8570D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M2000 vs Radeon HD 8570D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M2000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 200W, a 157W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌650% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$40 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $40 MSRP).
Radeon HD 8570D
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($40 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 627.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.3 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌365.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M2000 vs Radeon HD 8570D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.

Radeon HD 8570D
The Radeon HD 8570D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 413 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M2000 scores 426 and the Radeon HD 8570D reaches 413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M2000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 8570D uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (FirePro M2000) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8570D). Raw compute: 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8570D).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 426+3% | 413 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.024 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+150% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M2000 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8570D carries 512 MB. FirePro M2000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M2000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8570D. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M2000) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8570D) — the Radeon HD 8570D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (FirePro M2000) vs 11 (Radeon HD 8570D). OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4+5% |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (FirePro M2000) vs UVD3 (Radeon HD 8570D). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000) vs H.264,MVC,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 8570D).
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | UVD3 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,MVC,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M2000 draws 43W versus the Radeon HD 8570D's 200W — a 129.2% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M2000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8570D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-79% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9+371% | 2.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M2000 came in at $300, while the Radeon HD 8570D launched at $40. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8570D was 86.7% cheaper ($260 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (FirePro M2000) vs 10.3 (Radeon HD 8570D) — the Radeon HD 8570D offers 635.7% better value.
| Feature | FirePro M2000 | Radeon HD 8570D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $40-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 10.3+636% |
| Codename | Heathrow | Pitcairn |
| Release | July 1 2012 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #710 | #460 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














