FirePro M4170
GeForce GTX 1650
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,168 vs 7,869).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌34.2% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+573.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 804.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅FirePro M4170 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 573.7%. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 7,869+574% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 896+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS+332% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1665 MHz+85% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 896 KB+833% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M4170 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M4170) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | UVD | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 104.9+1245% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4170 came in at $200, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 25.5% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 810.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $149-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 52.8+810% |
| Codename | Opal | TU117 |
| Release | April 23 2015 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #838 | #323 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M4170 and GeForce GTX 1650
