FirePro M4170
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,168 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1839.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 872.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M4170 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1839.3%. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 22,651+1839% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4352+1033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+3092% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 2535 MHz+182% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 136+467% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 4.3 MB+4678% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 32 MB+12700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro M4170 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro M4170 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4170 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro M4170) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 32 MB+12700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4170) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4170) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: UVD vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 6.5% difference. The FirePro M4170 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-6% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 141.6+1715% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M4170 came in at $200, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, FirePro M4170 was 49.9% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 879.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-50% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 56.8+879% |
| Codename | Opal | AD106 |
| Release | April 23 2015 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #838 | #59 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro M4170 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
