
FirePro R5000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 3100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro R5000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌452.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,099 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 13.0 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌66.1% longer card at 279mm vs 168mm.
Radeon Pro WX 3100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 439.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 279mm, a 111mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro R5000
2013Radeon Pro WX 3100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 439.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,099 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 279mm, a 111mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌452.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,099 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 13.0 G3D/$ ($1,099 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌66.1% longer card at 279mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro R5000 better than Radeon Pro WX 3100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro WX 3100 make more sense than FirePro R5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 22 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro R5000 and Radeon Pro WX 3100

FirePro R5000
FirePro R5000
The FirePro R5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,647 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Radeon Pro WX 3100
Radeon Pro WX 3100
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro R5000 scores 2,647 and the Radeon Pro WX 3100 reaches 2,584 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro R5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (FirePro R5000) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro R5000) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,647+2% | 2,584 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.267 TFLOPS+2% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro R5000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro R5000) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro R5000) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 3100).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro R5000 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3100's 65W — a 79.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro R5000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 65W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 17.6 | 39.8+126% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro R5000 launched at $1099 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 3100 launched at $199. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 costs 81.9% less ($900 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (FirePro R5000) vs 13.0 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) — the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers 441.7% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro R5000 | Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1099 | $199-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.4 | 13.0+442% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Lexa |
| Release | February 25 2013 | June 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #619 | #624 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













