FirePro S10000 vs Arc Graphics 130V
FirePro S10000
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S10000 is positioned at rank 336 and the Arc Graphics 130V is on rank 302, so the Arc Graphics 130V offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S10000
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2012). The Arc Graphics 130V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S10000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S10000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130V.
| Insight | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (305mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc Graphics 130V offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $500 for the FirePro S10000, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 98.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S10000 and Arc Graphics 130V
FirePro S10000
The FirePro S10000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,537 points. Launch price was $3,599.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S10000 scores 4,537 and the Arc Graphics 130V reaches 4,510 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S10000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Arc Graphics 130V uses Xe², both on 28 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (FirePro S10000) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130V). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1850 MHz.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,537 | 4,510 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Xe² |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+58414% | 7 |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1850 MHz+95% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S10000 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB. The FirePro S10000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S10000) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130V). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro S10000) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130V). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro S10000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 (Arc Graphics 130V).
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S10000 draws 375W versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 15W — a 184.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S10000) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 305mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 15W-96% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 305mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.1 | 300.7+2385% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S10000 launched at $3599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Arc Graphics 130V costs 50% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (FirePro S10000) vs 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) — the Arc Graphics 130V offers 97.8% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro S10000 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3599 | $300-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $250-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1 | 18.0+98% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | November 12 2012 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #461 | #463 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S10000 and Arc Graphics 130V
