
FirePro V9800

Radeon RX 550
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon RX 550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon RX 550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon RX 550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V9800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌4329.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,499 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.8 vs 33.8 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,420 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4243% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.8 vs 0.8 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅FirePro V9800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V9800 vs Radeon RX 550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.

Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V9800 scores 2,727 and the Radeon RX 550 reaches 2,674 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V9800 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon RX 550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V9800) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,727+2% | 2,674 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+150% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS+53% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+150% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro V9800 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V9800 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V9800) vs 12_0 (Radeon RX 550). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_0+7% |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V9800) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V9800 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 550's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V9800) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 155mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 50W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 155mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 18.2 | 53.5+194% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V9800 came in at $3499, while the Radeon RX 550 launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 was 97.7% cheaper ($3420 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.8 (FirePro V9800) vs 33.8 (Radeon RX 550) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 4125% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V9800 | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3499 | $79-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.8 | 33.8+4125% |
| Codename | Cayman | Lexa |
| Release | May 24 2011 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #656 | #617 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















