FireStream 9270
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
FireStream 9270 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9270 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FireStream 9270 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9270
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,341 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌787% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+701.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 7009.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9270 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 701.6%. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 55 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,341 | 10,749+702% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Ampere |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 2304+188% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+465% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 72+80% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 2.3 MB+1337% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9270 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FireStream 9270) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9270) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate+19% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9270) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 241mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 8.4 | 153.6+1729% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9270 came in at $1499, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 88.7% cheaper ($1330 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FireStream 9270) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 6966.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $169-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 63.6+6967% |
| Codename | RV770 | GA107 |
| Release | November 13 2008 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #790 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9270 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
