FireStream 9270
GeForce RTX 4070
FireStream 9270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FireStream 9270 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9270
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 200W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 304mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,341 vs 26,919).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4070
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1907.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $900 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4923.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 200W vs 160W.
- ❌26.1% longer card at 304mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9270 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 1907.4%. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 55 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,341 | 26,919+1907% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 | 5888+636% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+2329% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 184+360% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 5.8 MB+3525% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 36 MB+14300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FireStream 9270 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FireStream 9270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9270 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FireStream 9270) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 12 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6X |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 36 MB+14300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FireStream 9270) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12.2+21% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FireStream 9270) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The FireStream 9270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-20% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 8.4 | 134.6+1502% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9270 came in at $1499, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4070 was 60% cheaper ($900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FireStream 9270) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 4888.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $599-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 44.9+4889% |
| Codename | RV770 | AD104 |
| Release | November 13 2008 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #790 | #32 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9270 and GeForce RTX 4070
