
FireStream 9270

Tesla M2070
FireStream 9270 vs Tesla M2070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FireStream 9270 vs Tesla M2070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FireStream 9270 vs Tesla M2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FireStream 9270
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,600 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,099 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 112.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.9 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $3,099 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla M2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌106.7% HIGHER MSRP$3,099 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($3,099 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FireStream 9270 vs Tesla M2070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.

Tesla M2070
The Tesla M2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,305 points. Launch price was $3,099.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the Tesla M2070 reaches 1,305 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the Tesla M2070 uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 448 (Tesla M2070). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 1.03 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,341+3% | 1,305 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+79% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS+17% | 1.03 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 896 KB+460% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9270 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070 carries 512 MB. FireStream 9270 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FireStream 9270 and 64-bit on the Tesla M2070. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FireStream 9270) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2070) — the Tesla M2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the Tesla M2070's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The FireStream 9270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 350W (Tesla M2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.4+45% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FireStream 9270 came in at $1499, while the Tesla M2070 launched at $3099. On MSRP, FireStream 9270 was 51.6% cheaper ($1600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (FireStream 9270) vs 0.4 (Tesla M2070) — the FireStream 9270 offers 125% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M2070 (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-52% | $3099 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9+125% | 0.4 |
| Codename | RV770 | GF100 |
| Release | November 13 2008 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #790 | #698 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















