CPU
GPU
FireStream 9270
Popular choices:
Tesla M2070-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FireStream 9270 is positioned at rank 359 and the Tesla M2070-Q is on rank 398, so the FireStream 9270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9270
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2070-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FireStream 9270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2070-Q.
| Insight | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9270 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9270 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 156.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+156.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FireStream 9270 and Tesla M2070-Q
FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.
Tesla M2070-Q
The Tesla M2070-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points. Launch price was $5,489.
Graphics Performance
The FireStream 9270 scores 1,341 and the Tesla M2070-Q reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FireStream 9270 is built on TeraScale while the Tesla M2070-Q uses Fermi, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (FireStream 9270) vs 448 (Tesla M2070-Q). Raw compute: 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla M2070-Q).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,341+3% | 1,306 |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Fermi |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+79% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.2 TFLOPS+17% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 896 KB+460% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FireStream 9270 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M2070-Q has 512 MB. The FireStream 9270 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FireStream 9270) vs 768 KB (Tesla M2070-Q) — the Tesla M2070-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The FireStream 9270 draws 160W versus the Tesla M2070-Q's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The FireStream 9270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FireStream 9270) vs 350W (Tesla M2070-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.4+45% | 5.8 |
Value Analysis
The FireStream 9270 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Tesla M2070-Q launched at $5489 and now averages $50. The FireStream 9270 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 67.0 (FireStream 9270) vs 26.1 (Tesla M2070-Q) — the FireStream 9270 offers 156.7% better value. The Tesla M2070-Q is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | FireStream 9270 | Tesla M2070-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-73% | $5489 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.0+157% | 26.1 |
| Codename | RV770 | GF100 |
| Release | November 13 2008 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #790 | #798 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FireStream 9270 and Tesla M2070-Q
