GeForce 8400M GT
GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce RTX 4060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 8400M GT
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 115W, a 82W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅7493.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 4778.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌248.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 8400M GT vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 8400M GT
The GeForce 8400M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8400M GT scores 67 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 29076.1%. The GeForce 8400M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67 | 19,548+29076% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3072+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+1650% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 2460 MHz+119% |
| ROPs | 8 | 48+500% |
| TMUs | 16 | 96+500% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3 MB+1479% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce 8400M GT does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 8400M GT is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8400M GT has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 8400M GT and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 8 GB+3100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12 Ultimate+20% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8400M GT) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8400M GT draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 110.8% difference. The GeForce 8400M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-71% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 73°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.0 | 170.0+8400% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 8400M GT came in at $50, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce 8400M GT was 83.3% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (GeForce 8400M GT) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 4930.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8400M GT | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-83% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.3 | 65.4+4931% |
| Codename | GM108 | AD107 |
| Release | March 12 2014 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #854 | #84 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8400M GT and GeForce RTX 4060
