
GeForce 9200M GE vs FirePro 2270

GeForce 9200M GE
Popular choices:

FirePro 2270
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9200M GE is positioned at rank 675 and the FirePro 2270 is on rank 352, so the FirePro 2270 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200M GE
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2270
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9200M GE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro 2270 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9200M GE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9200M GE holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 102.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+102.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9200M GE and FirePro 2270

GeForce 9200M GE
The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

FirePro 2270
The FirePro 2270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 142 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the FirePro 2270 reaches 142 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the FirePro 2270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 2,048 (FirePro 2270). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 2270).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 144+1% | 142 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2048+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5084 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+585% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9200M GE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 2270 has 1 GB. The FirePro 2270 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro 2270) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 11 (FirePro 2270). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11+10% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9200M GE) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2270). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2270).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the FirePro 2270's 274W — a 177.9% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (FirePro 2270). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 16W-94% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 60°C-20% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.0+1700% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9200M GE launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the FirePro 2270 launched at $149 and now averages $30. The GeForce 9200M GE costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 4.7 (FirePro 2270) — the GeForce 9200M GE offers 104.3% better value. The GeForce 9200M GE is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 9200M GE | FirePro 2270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-50% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6+104% | 4.7 |
| Codename | GM108 | Tahiti |
| Release | March 25 2016 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #864 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












