GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon HD 6290M

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6290M

2011Core: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon HD 6290M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon HD 6290M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon HD 6290M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9200M GE

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 16W instead of 75W, a 59W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6290M across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6290M

2011

Why buy it

  • 3.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 368.8% higher power demand at 75W vs 16W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6290M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.6% in average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9200M GE instead at 144 vs 140, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9200M GE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9200M GE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6290M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9200M GE vs Radeon HD 6290M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6290M

The Radeon HD 6290M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 140 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9200M GE scores 144 and the Radeon HD 6290M reaches 140 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9200M GE is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6290M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6290M). Raw compute: 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6290M).

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon HD 6290M
G3D Mark Score
144+3%
140
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
256
960+275%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5084 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+157%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
48+100%
L1 Cache
128 KB
192 KB+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9200M GE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6290M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon HD 6290M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9200M GE and System on the Radeon HD 6290M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6290M) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon HD 6290M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9200M GE draws 16W versus the Radeon HD 6290M's 75W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9200M GE) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon HD 6290M
TDP
16W-79%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
9.0+374%
1.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 9200M GE (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 9200M GERadeon HD 6290M
MSRP
$100
Codename
GM108
Blackcomb
Release
March 25 2016
January 4 2011
Ranking
#864
#654

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.