G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G210 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G210 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G210

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 70W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅2942.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 2048.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 3.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌133.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2942.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7162.8% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 14nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $119 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2048.8% (63.6 vs 3.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce G210 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G210

The GeForce G210 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce G210 scores 148 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 7162.8%. The GeForce G210 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G210) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G210) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G210	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	148	10,749+7163%
Architecture	Pascal	Ampere
Process Node	14 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	384	2304+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+501%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	1470 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	72+200%
L1 Cache	0.14 MB	2.3 MB+1543%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce G210 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce G210	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G210 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G210 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G210) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G210	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	6 GB+1100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	168 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+33%	96-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce G210) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce G210	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate+8%
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G210) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: VP4 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce G210) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce G210	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	None	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	VP4	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G210 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 80% difference. The GeForce G210 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G210) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 100 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce G210	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	30W-57%	70W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	168mm	160mm
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	100	75°C-25%
Perf/Watt	4.9	153.6+3035%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce G210 came in at $50, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce G210 was 70.4% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.0 (GeForce G210) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2020% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce G210	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP	$50-70%	$169
Performance per Dollar	3.0	63.6+2020%
Codename	GP108	GA107
Release	May 17 2017	February 2 2024
Ranking	#641	#252

Search GeForce G210 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.